Advertising as Charity or Charity as Advertising? posted an extract from The Economist discussing a new trend by major advertisers: they are “doing good”.

The 107 million Americans who tuned in to watch the Super Bowl on February 7th did not see any advertisements for Pepsi. Instead of spending $20m on a handful of 30-second spots, the firm decided to give that amount away. Under the slogan “Refresh Everything”, the Pepsi campaign asked the public to vote online for charities and community groups to receive grants ranging from $5,000 to $250,000. A few days before the game its arch-rival, Coca-Cola, was also bitten by a charitable bug. It promised to give $1 to the Boys & Girls Clubs of America every time someone watched its Super Bowl ads on its Facebook page, up to a maximum of $250,000.

Other recent examples include Chase Community Giving, in which small charities competed to win $5m in donations from JPMorgan Chase, and American Express and NBC Universal’s “Shine A Light” program, which awarded a grant of $100,000 to a small business chosen through its website.

Marketing people say consumers are increasingly trying to do good as they spend. Research in 2008 by Cone, a brand consultancy, found that 79% of consumers would switch to a brand associated with a good cause, up from 66% in 1993, and that 38% have bought a product associated with a cause, compared with 20% in 1993. Rather than try to make products that can be marketed as ethical in their own right, such as “fair trade” goods, firms are increasingly trying to take an ordinary product and boost its moral credentials with what one marketing guru calls “embedded generosity”. The fad for online competitions to award the handouts also appeals to another trend, so-called “slacktivism”, whereby people are turning to the internet to give their consciences a boost without doing anything more onerous than clicking a mouse a few times.

Do you want to try something like this on a local scale? What about using direct mail to lead your customers to support your favorite cause?


  1. You make some good, valid points, but I can’t say that I agree with you completely on this one.

  2. This is a great blog, thanks for posting this. I actually have a few clients who would find this intriguing and will be sending them over.

  3. lol a few of the observations individuals submit are so silly, quite often i wonder whether they in fact read the articles or reviews and content before writing or if perhaps they only read the title of the article and write the very first thing that drifts into their minds. in any case, it is actually enjoyable to browse clever commentary once in a while compared to the same exact, old oppinion vomit which i typically notice on the internet

  4. chips zynga says:

    lol a few of the comments many people make are just absurd, there are times i wonder if they in truth read the article content and reports before writing a comment or if perhaps they mearly read the subject of the post and pen the very first thing that pops into their brain. anyways, it is really useful to browse smart commentary once in a while as opposed to the exact same, outdated blog vomit that i ordinarily observe on the web i’m going to take up a couple of hands of facebook poker hasta la vista

  5. chips zynga says:

    eventhough I expend a large amount of of my day on the net playing online games like myspace poker or petville, I nevertheless like to dedicate some spare time to compare a a small number of sites on occasion and I’m proud to report this newest post is really sort of good quality and enormously superior than 1 / 2 the various other waste I read today , anyhow i’m off to have fun with a couple of rounds of facebook poker

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *